|
Post by Geo 🇺🇦 🌻 on Feb 12, 2016 16:10:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jae on Feb 12, 2016 16:20:34 GMT -5
Does Adobe just not test things before releasing them into the wild, or...?
|
|
|
Post by Geo 🇺🇦 🌻 on Feb 12, 2016 16:33:50 GMT -5
Whaaat? Adobe...test things? Nope. That's probably why the Adobe Flash plugin is like Swiss cheese, full of security holes and vulnerabilities.
Also, please don't follow any instructions given in the comments section of that article. They are merely snarky responses and not intended to "fix" anything except they purge the existence of all Adobe software from your machine.
|
|
|
Post by Jae on Feb 12, 2016 17:11:13 GMT -5
Regarding Flash, it's probably the other way around: it's simply too easy to crack that they can't account for every possible potential vulnerability. Which, now that I think about it, just makes Adobe look worse, if anything. P:
I didn't notice any instructions that weren't just quoted from the article itself, although I wasn't reading closely. Most of what I saw was a debate about purchasing a product up-front vs. subscription-based models.
In general, though, not listening to advice from the comment section is a pretty good rule of thumb on any website.
|
|
|
Post by Geo 🇺🇦 🌻 on Feb 12, 2016 17:46:07 GMT -5
Generally plugins are bad. Let's provide a way for the website to gain direct access to files on your computer. Surely there won't be any issues there.
This is why the Java plugin (not to be confused with Javascript) and Silverlight are both projects that will end. Flash would be the only remaining widespread plugin.
Anyways, stay safe, even with programs that you pay for and expect not to exhibit malware behavior.
|
|