|
|
Post by Kat on Apr 20, 2007 6:04:58 GMT -5
[shadow=purple,left,300]But I sure as heck am not going to be in it. XD
Since there are a lot of members on the forum who have anthro personas, why not have a guild for anthros? Dunno...that just struck me. Or even just a club.[/shadow]
|
|
|
|
Post by Salah~ on Apr 20, 2007 17:05:05 GMT -5
I personally think a club would be better, but that's just my opinion. Anthro doesn't seem like the kind of thing you'd need a whole guild for to me is all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2007 17:31:29 GMT -5
I have to agree with Salah; it seems more like club material than the birth of *yet another* new guild.
I mean, really, would membership be, like, mandatory for all kitsunes, werewolves, and Neopets? lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Strife on Apr 20, 2007 17:32:25 GMT -5
A while ago (before the guild overhaul), I think there was talk about a furry/anthro guild, but I guess they decided not to go with the idea. I remember that there was a bit of a dispute as to the definition of an anthro, since some of the forumers only had animal ears and tails, but an otherwise human body.
|
|
|
|
Post by Enn on Apr 20, 2007 17:34:52 GMT -5
It's also not something... guildworthy, is the best way I can put it. You can't betray the anthros, you can't really get into a war because you've got fur and they don't. It seems to me harder to make an RP about being anthro than having magical powers, or being a ninja or knight. Plus, like Strife said, the whole definition problem.
|
|
|
|
Post by Frozen on Apr 20, 2007 19:52:12 GMT -5
You can't betray the anthros, you can't really get into a war because you've got fur and they don't. [glow=teal,2,300]That sounds racist. ._. [/glow] |
|
