|
Post by Mostly Harmless (flufflepuff) on Jan 15, 2015 0:22:10 GMT -5
I dunno. Those look more like dyed cotton balls to me. Moltara if I know I was at his house that night. One last note and then it's bedtime for Cassie: I'm playing Meepit's advocate here--say I was the arsonist. What, if ANY benefit would I gain by saying I was controlled? Wouldn't be smart. Healer. If you have any pride in what you do, and if I make it, cover me for the next few nights. I've got some investigating to do.
|
|
|
Post by Avery on Jan 15, 2015 1:51:13 GMT -5
ntwitter [search: ] Have an account? log in.
Sort by: Ascending -> last 24 hours
|
|
|
Post by icon on Jan 15, 2015 2:53:31 GMT -5
[NTWF Journal HQ]
brrrrrrriiing, brrrrrrrrii-
"Good evening, NTWF Journal, this is The Editor speaking. How may I be of assista- oh, it's you, Rhea. What do you need?"
"'Do I use ntwitter'? What kind of a question is that, I don't have time to deal with the tweets of a thousand angry bloggers. No, I don't use ntwitter. Why do you ask?"
"Okay, okay, I'm going on right now. You said her username is at writer, yes?"
"Okay, I typed in 'at-writer' and it's not showing up."
...
"Oh, of course, my mistake, sorry...nope, tried searching 'at-rhyter' and it's still not there."
...
"...Are you sure? 'at-sign-rhyter' isn't pulling up any names either... 'shift-two-rhyter,' no, wait- what?"
...
"'hold-down-shift-and-press-TWO-rhyter' is even worse, what are you- no, don't spell it out for me character-by-character! I know how to type, I don't have to hunt and peck! Just tell me what the username is and I'll-- hello? Hello? Are you still there?"
...
[sigh]
"Well, now that's two journalists I'm in no position to deal with right now."
|
|
|
Post by Christos on Jan 15, 2015 6:56:33 GMT -5
This town is getting darker and darker
|
|
|
Post by Layla "Nimbus" Karimi on Jan 15, 2015 9:52:15 GMT -5
Wrong, wrong, and wrong. The sorcerer can't influence the arsonist, they have too strong of a will. It's over, pony girl. That is entirely untrue. XD Night immune DOES NOT MEAN YOU CANNOT BE CONTROLLED. It just means you cannot die. Um, I was looking over the roles thread again, and it says the Sorcerer can only control members of the town. So wouldn't the Sorcerer have been unable to control the Arsonist anyway? Not saying that this means (if that info is still correct) that I'm implicating Cassie here. I'm still trying to parse together information at the moment, and see if I can figure out who here is lying.
|
|
|
Post by Mostly Harmless (flufflepuff) on Jan 15, 2015 11:43:20 GMT -5
Now consider this possibility: what if neither Ginz or I was lying? I was a bewitched cop, therefore UNKNOWINGLY visiting Christos instead of my intended person, Ginz decided to follow me/set it up (Spy? Sorcerer?), and the arsonist went to Christos also, undetected. If neither of us is lying, Christos is most likely clear(he showed up as inno on my report but we can't forget the godfather possibility), I'm clear, and Ginz is partly clear. (Sorcerer is wicked, Spy is inno, and she hadn't said exactly which role she was. Based on the way she worded it though,she's probably claiming spy. Is that right, Ginz ❤?) No one's counter claimed me or Ginz yet. If anyone would like to counter claim detective or Spy and tell me I'm wrong as well as what you found, now is the time to speak up.
|
|
|
Post by Avery on Jan 15, 2015 13:12:20 GMT -5
That is entirely untrue. XD Night immune DOES NOT MEAN YOU CANNOT BE CONTROLLED. It just means you cannot die. Um, I was looking over the roles thread again, and it says the Sorcerer can only control members of the town. So wouldn't the Sorcerer have been unable to control the Arsonist anyway? Not saying that this means (if that info is still correct) that I'm implicating Cassie here. I'm still trying to parse together information at the moment, and see if I can figure out who here is lying. Ah sorry if the phrasing there is unclear. Town there is meant loosely and not as "innocent town members"- the sorcerer can control anybody in the game.
|
|
|
Post by Christos on Jan 15, 2015 14:23:11 GMT -5
Now consider this possibility: what if neither Ginz or I was lying? I was a bewitched cop, therefore UNKNOWINGLY visiting Christos instead of my intended person, Ginz decided to follow me/set it up (Spy? Sorcerer?), and the arsonist went to Christos also, undetected. If neither of us is lying, Christos is most likely clear(he showed up as inno on my report but we can't forget the godfather possibility), I'm clear, and Ginz is partly clear. (Sorcerer is wicked, Spy is inno, and she hadn't said exactly which role she was. Based on the way she worded it though,she's probably claiming spy. Is that right, Ginz ❤?) No one's counter claimed me or Ginz yet. If anyone would like to counter claim detective or Spy and tell me I'm wrong as well as what you found, now is the time to speak up. This is confusing xD So are you saying that you as a detective, coincidentally got spied on night 1, bewitched by the sorcerer on night 1 to visit me instead of your target, /and/ coincidentally I got doused by the arsonist, all on night 1? That's so many coincidences for one night
|
|
|
Post by Mostly Harmless (flufflepuff) on Jan 15, 2015 14:46:09 GMT -5
Yeah, Christos. That just about sums it up.
IF Ginz isn't lying.
Also, why are you making it seem like I'm not telling the truth? I said YOU are just about in the clear if that's what happened, which I've more than reason to believe it did.
Now that I think about it...Why didn't she out that I visited you, if I did, earlier than now?
"To avoid being killed", yes. It's the same reason I'm doing it now. But I, as it stands, am a very high kill target by the mafia and other wicked-neutrals. That's why I stayed hidden until now, where it looks like I'm going to die anyway.
The rest of you townies are going to off your own asset, just like Mafia 3.
She probably got nervous because there were four votes on her (presumably by mafia) and everyone bandwagoned, like you're doing now.
|
|
|
Post by Kozma on Jan 15, 2015 15:50:26 GMT -5
Gah, this is making my head hurt.
If I may state my opinion here...
I found it rather strange how Ginz had five execution votes yesterday and nobody provided an explanation as to why. It kind of gave me the idea that the Mafia could try and anonymously start a lynch train on someone by all voting for them and I was wondering if that was the case. Now, by my understanding, the blame has been put on Cassie as being guilty.
I know this game is about deceit but I'm worried about the decision being made here. Either Ginz or Cassie could be lying but they both could be telling the truth. I don't really know what the reasoning behind everyone's votes is but somehow I believe the mafia's trying to get us to lynch an innocent.
I don't know - I'm so confused right now and I have no idea who to vote for.
I dread to see what will happen when it's execution time.
*whines*
|
|
|
Post by Mostly Harmless (flufflepuff) on Jan 15, 2015 16:12:03 GMT -5
Kozma: you're absolutely correct. But the fact that she had five votes on her without explanation might mean one of the mafia roles was duped, OR four of them started the lynch train and everyone bandwagoned her. You are also correct in that the blame has been put on me as being guilty based on the evidence. I gave my explanation, but I'll give it one more time. Ginz said that on Night One, when Christos was doused, I was there. She did NOT say I was the one who doused him. See, I know for a fact that the night Christos was doused, someone who visited him left a clue: a couple strands of pink fluffy hair, unlike any human's. How would she know this? I've raised the possibility of her being a Spy, choosing Christos as her target. However, according to Carrie, and I quote: Ginz would have known who else visited him and doused him, and would have brought up the identities of two people. The only ways she could have not said who else had visited him are: A: If she was the sorcerer and MADE me investigate him B: She is lying and is the arsonist herself. C: She is lying and is an entirely different role, making my investigation on the first night unknown once again, in that someone came up innocent. Here's the thing: on the first night, I was bewitched by the sorcerer. I intended to investigate someone, but was switched to investigate someone else, and was not given the identity of the person I was checking out. The person I ended up investigating turned up innocent. IF WHAT GINZ SAYS IS TRUE, THEN: I investigated Christos. Christos is innocent. Ginz may be the sorcerer/arsonist. By the way, I investigated Pixie the second night. She came up suspicious. If she wants to defend herself here, or claim, I bid her go ahead. Furthermore, there's one little detail I left out... I'M UNCC'D.
There is NO ONE who came out to claim they're the real detective instead of me.The Healer is alive. They can protect whom they truly believe is telling the truth. I fear nothing.
|
|
|
Post by Layla "Nimbus" Karimi on Jan 15, 2015 16:18:12 GMT -5
Gah, this is making my head hurt. If I may state my opinion here... I found it rather strange how Ginz had five execution votes yesterday and nobody provided an explanation as to why. It kind of gave me the idea that the Mafia could try and anonymously start a lynch train on someone by all voting for them and I was wondering if that was the case. Now, by my understanding, the blame has been put on Cassie as being guilty. I know this game is about deceit but I'm worried about the decision being made here. Either Ginz or Cassie could be lying but they both could be telling the truth. I don't really know what the reasoning behind everyone's votes is but somehow I believe the mafia's trying to get us to lynch an innocent. I don't know - I'm so confused right now and I have no idea who to vote for. I dread to see what will happen when it's execution time. *whines* It is a little worrying that people seem to be mass-voting without really seeming to explain why. I dunno how everyone else is making their decisions, but I personally have been jotting down analyses of everything that's been/is being said regarding this whole mess and what it would mean either if they're lying or telling the truth about one thing or another and how the different facts could all fit together in regards to roles. It helps with organizing and clearing up the possibilities, buuuuut so far all I've got is a bunch of possible scenarios that run the gamut from both of them being innocent to both of them being "evil" neutrals :I I'm leaning toward Cassie genuinely being the Detective, though. Everything she's said so far, taken all together, seems like it would make for too complicated and risky of a lie if she wanted to lead us down the wrong trail without being called out on it. I was also beginning to suspect her of being the Detective before she made the claim to it. I'm not quite certain yet, though.
|
|
|
Post by Draco on Jan 15, 2015 16:50:52 GMT -5
Just for the record. Most people in important roles, don't like to claim them early on. Since that means Mafia is just going to kill them right away and then doom the rest of the town XD
So if no one jumps in to counter claim roles, like you want, it's because they want to live! Or you're telling the truth.
And while pointing fingers and stuff...
Vote for me? *confused look*
|
|
|
Post by Kozma on Jan 15, 2015 16:52:58 GMT -5
Kozma: you're absolutely correct. But the fact that she had five votes on her without explanation might mean one of the mafia roles was duped, OR four of them started the lynch train and everyone bandwagoned her. You are also correct in that the blame has been put on me as being guilty based on the evidence. I gave my explanation, but I'll give it one more time. Ginz said that on Night One, when Christos was doused, I was there. She did NOT say I was the one who doused him. See, I know for a fact that the night Christos was doused, someone who visited him left a clue: a couple strands of pink fluffy hair, unlike any human's. How would she know this? I've raised the possibility of her being a Spy, choosing Christos as her target. However, according to Carrie, and I quote: Ginz would have known who else visited him and doused him, and would have brought up the identities of two people. The only ways she could have not said who else had visited him are: A: If she was the sorcerer and MADE me investigate him B: She is lying and is the arsonist herself. C: She is lying and is an entirely different role, making my investigation on the first night unknown once again, in that someone came up innocent. Here's the thing: on the first night, I was bewitched by the sorcerer. I intended to investigate someone, but was switched to investigate someone else, and was not given the identity of the person I was checking out. The person I ended up investigating turned up innocent. IF WHAT GINZ SAYS IS TRUE, THEN: I investigated Christos. Christos is innocent. Ginz may be the sorcerer/arsonist. By the way, I investigated Pixie the second night. She came up suspicious. Furthermore, there's one little detail I left out... I'M UNCC'D.
There is NO ONE who came out to claim they're the real detective instead of me.The Healer is alive. They can protect whom they truly believe is telling the truth. I fear nothing. Well, I'm afraid the healer is unable to save anyone from lynching so if we can't dissuade everyone into keeping you alive we may be out of luck. I do believe you when you say you're the detective. I'm not sure what else to believe here given the complex web of events but I can understand why you're claiming to be the detective given how you're on the chopping block. I wouldn't be surprised if the Mafia's trying to sway the vote here. *headache*
|
|
|
Post by Mostly Harmless (flufflepuff) on Jan 15, 2015 16:58:01 GMT -5
Just for the record. Most people in important roles, don't like to claim them early on. Since that means Mafia is just going to kill them right away and then doom the rest of the town XD So if no one jumps in to counter claim roles, like you want, it's because they want to live! Or you're telling the truth. And while pointing fingers and stuff... Vote for me? *confused look* The mafia won't kill them if the healer saves them. And no, Draco, I'm not going to vote for you. I have no reason to do so at the moment. =P Kozma, I don't blame you. Everyone's a bit panicked because of Ranumgen. It's making a lot of us go crazy. All I, or any of us can do, is say what we need to say.
|
|