|
Post by Celestial on May 28, 2010 11:47:58 GMT -5
xD Yes but now that we're even, things could change.
[dice=30]*23'd*
Make Thing my active
Put Stal's Whiteboard on the bench and attach an Air Energy to it. (I am allowed to do this right? >>;; )
Thing uses Fear. Steampunk Alchemist takes 2 damge.
Celestial (KOs [X][X][X][]) Active: Thing From The Tabloids - (D) - HP 8/8 - Benched: Stal's Whiteboard - (A)- 5/5 HP
Sarn (KOs [X][X][X][]) Active: Steampunk Alchemist - (L)(L) - HP 4/6 - Benched: Lady Sarinon - (L)(L) - HP 3/5 - (Poisoned) Commander Strife - - HP 1/5 - (Poisoned) [rand=71216259942129769364087637314443558074736828692420045531531133176]
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2010 18:43:25 GMT -5
Why would you -not- be allowed to. xD
Draw: [dice=30]
I attach an earth energy to Strife
Steampunk Alchemist uses Alchemy for 3 damage. The attack is given elemental advantage +2 because both energies are the light. Total 5 damage.
Celestial (KOs [X][X][X][]) Active: Thing From The Tabloids - (D) - HP 3/8 - Benched: Stal's Whiteboard - (A) - HP 5/5 -
Sarn (KOs [X][X][X][]) Active: Steampunk Alchemist - (L)(L) - HP 4/6 - Benched: Lady Sarinon - (L)(L) - HP 3/5 - (Poisoned) Commander Strife - (E) - HP 1/5 - (Poisoned) [rand=560053007993975307786177064043509978729159007708506019707498266891]
|
|
|
Post by Celestial on May 28, 2010 19:12:04 GMT -5
[dice=30] Attach a Dark Energy to Thing From The Tabloids. Retreat Thing and replace it with Stal's Whiteboard. Stal's Whiteboard uses Wall of Text. Steampunk Alchemist takes 2 damage +2 elemental advantage. Steampunk Alchemist is KO'd Celestial (KOs [X][X][X][X]) Active: Stal's Whiteboard - (A) - HP 5/5 - Benched: Thing From The Tabloids - HP 3/8 - Sarn (KOs [X][X][X][]) Active: Steampunk Alchemist - (L)(L) - HP 0/6 - Benched: Lady Sarinon - (L)(L) - HP 3/5 - (Poisoned) Commander Strife - (E) - HP 1/5 - (Poisoned) ...*blinks* Did I just win? <3 That was an awesome game, Sarn. You were a great player and a real challenge to beat.[rand=075880542353835462184821053495215159281855627440248518163299531378]
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2010 20:40:01 GMT -5
Well, at least I didn't let you have it easy. I think I'm getting better at this dueling thing. xDDD *snuggles* You're a pro, Cele.
|
|
|
Post by Celestial on May 28, 2010 20:49:20 GMT -5
Well, at least I didn't let you have it easy. I think I'm getting better at this dueling thing. xDDD *snuggles* You're a pro, Cele. xDD No you most certainly didn't. *snuggles back* ^_^ You're very good too, Sarnlove!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2010 21:10:59 GMT -5
Well, at least I didn't let you have it easy. I think I'm getting better at this dueling thing. xDDD *snuggles* You're a pro, Cele. xDD No you most certainly didn't. *snuggles back* ^_^ You're very good too, Sarnlove! I just had a thought, right ... Steampunk Alchemist's attack says if both energies are the same, it gets elemental advantages, but the card itself is still colourless, so whether or not it is affected by elemental advantages isn't actually clear. I'm not contesting your win, but perhaps it needs to be decided and clarified? What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by Lizzie on May 28, 2010 21:13:33 GMT -5
Hi, sorry to butt in, but, I want my opinion in this.
Colorless should NOT be affected by elemental advantages because that would mean redoing the whole entire advantages system.
|
|
|
Post by Celestial on May 28, 2010 21:18:36 GMT -5
xDD No you most certainly didn't. *snuggles back* ^_^ You're very good too, Sarnlove! I just had a thought, right ... Steampunk Alchemist's attack says if both energies are the same, it gets elemental advantages, but the card itself is still colourless, so whether or not it is affected by elemental advantages isn't actually clear. I'm not contesting your win, but perhaps it needs to be decided and clarified? What do you think? Hmm...I'd say we need to give it elemental weakness since right now the card has elemental strength but not weakness which makes it overpowered slightly. So I'd think the card should take on the element that it has the energies of, to add a price for the elemental advantage. It wouldn't depower it though because all it would take to change the element is a retreat and a switch of energies, which means the card isn't totally weak. Plus, adding a price for using the elemental advantage does make it follow the equivalent exchange rule, which is very important in alchemy. *brick'd*
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2010 22:12:38 GMT -5
I just had a thought, right ... Steampunk Alchemist's attack says if both energies are the same, it gets elemental advantages, but the card itself is still colourless, so whether or not it is affected by elemental advantages isn't actually clear. I'm not contesting your win, but perhaps it needs to be decided and clarified? What do you think? Hmm...I'd say we need to give it elemental weakness since right now the card has elemental strength but not weakness which makes it overpowered slightly. So I'd think the card should take on the element that it has the energies of, to add a price for the elemental advantage. It wouldn't depower it though because all it would take to change the element is a retreat and a switch of energies, which means the card isn't totally weak. Plus, adding a price for using the elemental advantage does make it follow the equivalent exchange rule, which is very important in alchemy. *brick'd* Agreed. I'll edit the wording so its clearer. ^^
|
|