|
|
Post by Battlesunnn on Feb 24, 2003 1:57:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ecicca on Feb 24, 2003 14:09:06 GMT -5
Oooooooooooooo! Wow! I love it! Keep it up ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Rin on Feb 24, 2003 15:17:06 GMT -5
Fantastic pic! The eye looks great and really stands out. Did you use a tablet for this? Which is the shading that you don't like?
|
|
|
|
Post by LDF on Feb 24, 2003 16:53:19 GMT -5
Thats a great picture, Battlesunn! Keep up the good work! Never stop drawing! The eye stands out really well compared to all the silvery feathers o-O
|
|
|
|
Post by sollunaestrella on Feb 24, 2003 18:35:57 GMT -5
Oooooh...pretty. Uber-spiffy! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Battlesunnn on Feb 24, 2003 19:49:30 GMT -5
Fantastic pic! The eye looks great and really stands out. Did you use a tablet for this? Which is the shading that you don't like? Nah, tablets are too expensive. All my pictures are completely, 100% mousedrawn.  I didn't like how the mane came out... Or the shading around the neck.  Thanks for all the compliments! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by lupe on Feb 24, 2003 19:50:59 GMT -5
Spiffariffic!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by peachifruit on Feb 24, 2003 19:57:55 GMT -5
Very peachi-keen! I like the shading!
|
|
|
|
Post by Smiley on Feb 24, 2003 21:13:03 GMT -5
It's pretty cool ;D I couldn't draw crap with a mouse if my life depended on it
|
|
|
|
Post by Linnen Malfoy on Feb 24, 2003 21:23:40 GMT -5
Pretty! I like the eye! ^_^
|
|
|
|
Post by spectrum on Feb 24, 2003 23:31:55 GMT -5
Immense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2003 23:51:46 GMT -5
Good job, Sunny! Do you plan on putting it in the art gallery? I actually sort of like the shades you use. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Battlesunnn on Feb 25, 2003 1:16:04 GMT -5
Good job, Sunny! Do you plan on putting it in the art gallery? I actually sort of like the shades you use. ;D Nah, it wouldn't get in. It's kind of funny, actually, I happen to know for a fact that the gallery staff doesn't even look at my pictures. How? The image server that I upload any art gallery entries on, villagephotos, has a view counter. In other words, every time someone clicks on the URL and looks at the pics then it counts it. My pictures never have any views. Poor me. I give up, you hear that, Donna? I'll stop bothering you with submissions that you never even look at...  |
|
|
|
Post by Tdyans on Feb 25, 2003 2:36:02 GMT -5
Nah, it wouldn't get in. It's kind of funny, actually, I happen to know for a fact that the gallery staff doesn't even look at my pictures. How? The image server that I upload any art gallery entries on, villagephotos, has a view counter. In other words, every time someone clicks on the URL and looks at the pics then it counts it. My pictures never have any views. Poor me. I give up, you hear that, Donna? I'll stop bothering you with submissions that you never even look at... I thought you actually had to send them the picture (like in an attachment), not just a URL.... I mean, I know that's okay with the NT staff, but other departments might not accept it... but I don't really know since I haven't seen the auto-response for the Art Gallery. It was just always my assumption that you had to send them the picture rather than just tell them where to see it-- maybe that would improve your chances of them at least looking at it anyway...? |
|
|
|
Post by Battlesunnn on Feb 25, 2003 11:08:39 GMT -5
I thought you actually had to send them the picture (like in an attachment), not just a URL.... I mean, I know that's okay with the NT staff, but other departments might not accept it... but I don't really know since I haven't seen the auto-response for the Art Gallery. It was just always my assumption that you had to send them the picture rather than just tell them where to see it-- maybe that would improve your chances of them at least looking at it anyway...? In the auto responce it does say that you can either send the URL for an image or attach the image... |
|
