|
Post by Midtime on Jan 16, 2011 5:17:05 GMT -5
Gladly. Cited. Incorrect, but cited.
|
|
|
Post by "AA" on Jan 16, 2011 5:20:36 GMT -5
Your geographical argument won't stand up to much scrutiny. Let me convert it into mathematics for you.
|
|
|
Post by Midtime on Jan 16, 2011 5:24:02 GMT -5
The two don't correlate in the least; nor do simple mathematical arguments generally match the complexity of the other fields with any reasonable measure of accuracy. Convoluted workings out of the same argument do not improve accuracy.
Besides, this has gotten off-topic.
|
|
|
Post by "AA" on Jan 16, 2011 5:27:30 GMT -5
Well, since you're so stubborn, I guess I'll have to come at this from a different angle.
*steals monocle* *runs*
Wait... I can't run from myself. Darn. Aaargh! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!! *runs around in triangles*
WELL FINE, YOU WANT TO DO THIS THE HARD WAY DO YOU? BRING IT ON!
*whips out blaster* *blasts self*
...
*static*
|
|
|
Post by Tam on Jan 16, 2011 5:29:29 GMT -5
Yeah, er, guy(s)? As interesting as this is to watch, I'm not sure Times Lobby is exactly the place for personalities to dissociate. xD;
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2011 5:57:21 GMT -5
I feel compelled to point out that both Proboards and Neopets do not allow users to have multiple main accounts, and submitting to the NT from two accounts is unfair to the rest us who only get one shot at it. I am not about to report you, but I would strongly advise you to consider the implications for others, as well as the rules you agreed to follow when you signed up for these accounts.
|
|
|
Post by Midtime on Jan 16, 2011 6:46:42 GMT -5
Now that my brother's gone for a shower, I'll say that, past all other doubts, there's no conceivable reason for my submitting series pertaining to entirely different canons. Even a superficial examination of our taste in writing styles, and the difference between my idealistic cohesive mythology and his realistic rapid plots, will show that we are - if siblings - entirely separate organisms; I cannot say an individual disagreeing with himself to such an extent as (if I may advert to the above) is demonstrated could quite manage to write such wholeheartedly disagreeable stories with the smallest amount of proper satisfaction.
|
|
|
Post by "AA" on Jan 16, 2011 6:52:58 GMT -5
Under threat of theft of my headphones, I am hereby conceding this debate (not that I had any hope of winning it in the first place). We are, in fact, brothers. And yes, we do argue like this in real life too. xD
|
|
|
Post by Huntress on Jan 16, 2011 7:52:06 GMT -5
Mmyes. Look up the definition for "spam" while you're at it. Because it ain't allowed on this forum and it'd be a shame to have to fry both your accounts for it somewhere down the line.
And yes, if you even imply that you were one person with two accounts, it's pretty easy to get in trouble for that either with us or with Neo, joking or not. It's hard to convey emotions over the internets and if someone in TNT looked into this and decided that your debate here was just one person trying to make a joke (which it does rather look like), the results wouldn't be all that funny anymore.
|
|
|
Post by "AA" on Jan 16, 2011 8:21:41 GMT -5
Duly noted ma'am, thanks for the warning. You can rest assured that I'm normally quite reasonable (passionate geek rants and general insanity aside) and not spammy at all, rapidly degenerating debates with a sibling being the exception rather than the rule. xD You can look me up on TDN Forums if you're in need of supporting evidence.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2011 8:52:38 GMT -5
My apologies for misunderstanding, but Hunty makes a very good point, and it's not unheard of for TNT to drop their noses into this place. Several TNT staff members are also members here, and at least one pokes around often enough. Just be careful, is all. ^^
|
|
|
Post by Midtime on Jan 16, 2011 9:26:28 GMT -5
Yes - I'll make sure to study DID in future (which may not be entirely outside my interests).
Likely before the generally correct use of 'spam' becomes applicable this ought to be halted; but neither one of us really considered this a topic of discussion to be taken in soberness from the set-out; nor had I ever supposed the opposing arguments to be anything less than self-crippling, or the dichotomy to be anything less than self-evident. I do apologise, with all due and sincere appendices of assurance to discontinuation, for any confusion caused by such uncharacteristic behaviour of ours; further I hope that the issue itself may be dispensed with (all likely proofs having been set forth with clarity).
|
|
|
Post by "AA" on Jan 16, 2011 18:59:04 GMT -5
Erm... what he said. xD But yeah, thanks for the heads up.
|
|